FoxTvPixel


510 Arizona Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90401 | Available 24/7

Mesriani law | Just Got Fired or Laid Off in California

Just Got Fired or Laid Off in California? 7 Red Flags Your Termination Was Illegal

Table of Contents for Specific Topics

Getting fired or laid off can feel like a sudden, devastating blow, especially here in high-stakes California. The immediate reaction is often shock, followed by a scramble for what’s next. But what if that termination wasn’t just unfortunate—what if it was against the law?

While California is an “at-will” employment state, meaning an employer can generally terminate an employee for almost any reason, that freedom is not absolute. State and federal laws create crucial exceptions that protect you from being fired for discriminatory reasons, as an act of retaliation, or due to improper procedures. If you were recently let go, don’t sign any severance agreement before looking closely for these seven major red flags.

The 7 Red Flags Your California Termination May Be Unlawful

An illegal termination often leaves a paper trail or a pattern of suspicious timing. Here are the key indicators that your rights may have been violated:

1. Discrimination Based on Protected Characteristics

Did your termination coincide with a change in your personal life or an observation made by your employer? Under California Government Code § 12940, it is unlawful to terminate an employee based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, or other protected statuses, unless it’s a bona fide occupational qualification. If you can draw a clear line between your protected status and the firing decision, that’s a massive red flag.

2. Retaliation for Whistleblowing or Reporting Violations

Were you recently fired after speaking up about something illegal or unsafe your employer was doing? California Labor Code § 1102.5 explicitly protects employees from retaliation for disclosing or reporting violations of law, even if the disclosure is only anticipated or perceived. This is a critical protection for the public good.

Example: Retaliation for whistleblowing can form the basis of a wrongful termination claim in violation of public policy (Killgore v. SpecPro Pro. Servs., LLC).

3. Failure to Provide WARN Act Notices

If your termination was part of a large-scale event, you may have been entitled to advance warning. The California WARN Act (which supplements the federal WARN Act) generally requires employers to provide 60 days’ written notice before a mass layoff, relocation, or termination at a covered establishment. Failure to provide this notice, absent specific exemptions like a physical calamity, may render the layoff illegal (Cal Lab Code § 1401).

4. Violation of Fundamental Public Policy

Termination is illegal if it violates fundamental public policies. This usually occurs when an employee is fired for refusing to engage in an illegal activity or for performing a statutory obligation. For example, the courts have recognized that firing an employee for reporting violations of federal immigration laws constitutes a termination in violation of public policy (Jie v. Liang Tai Knitwear Co.). This is about protecting you when you do the right thing.

5. Retaliation for Exercising Statutory Rights

Were you fired after filing a complaint about discrimination, seeking legally protected time off (like FMLA or CFRA), or participating in an investigation? Both state and federal laws, including 42 USCS § 2000e-3, prohibit termination in retaliation for asserting statutory rights. The timing of the firing relative to your protected activity is key evidence here.

6. Improper Procedures in Civil Service or Public Employment

If you are a public employee, your employer has even stricter rules to follow. Failure to adhere to prescribed procedures for layoffs or terminations, such as providing proper notice or allowing an internal appeal process, can render the action improper. Public employees often have additional procedural due process rights that must be honored (Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County).

7. Lack of Good Faith in Civil Service Layoff Decisions

For civil service employees, specifically, layoffs must be conducted in good faith and follow prescribed regulations. If a layoff is found to be pretextual—meaning it was not actually done for legitimate economic reasons but to get rid of a specific employee—it may be deemed improper. Employees under the State Civil Service Act can appeal layoffs that were not conducted in good faith (Stockton v. Department of Employment).

Conclusion: Why You Need an Employment Lawyer Immediately

You just read about seven serious indicators that your termination may have been illegal. This is the critical juncture: If you recognize even one of these red flags, your next step should not be applying for a new job—it should be calling an employment lawyer.

An attorney can evaluate the facts, identify which laws were violated, and ensure you meet strict filing deadlines. They will help you understand your options, whether it’s filing a charge with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), or filing a wrongful termination lawsuit. Do not speak to your former employer’s legal counsel or sign any documents (especially a release of claims) without legal advice. Your case may not only result in compensation for lost wages and emotional distress but may also deter your former employer from breaking the law again.

📚 Sources

  • California Government Code § 12940 (Prohibits discrimination in employment).
  • California Labor Code § 1102.5 (Protects whistleblowers from retaliation).
  • California Labor Code § 1401 (Addresses the requirement for WARN Act notices).
  • 42 USCS § 2000e-3 (Prohibits retaliation under federal Title VII).
  • Killgore v. SpecPro Pro. Servs., LLC, 51 F.4th 973 (Illustrates retaliation for whistleblowing).
  • The Internat. Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc. v. NASSCO Holdings Inc., 17 Cal. App. 5th 1105 (Addresses WARN Act violations).
  • Jie v. Liang Tai Knitwear Co., 89 Cal. App. 4th 654 (Discusses termination in violation of public policy).
  • Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 8 Cal. 3d 723 (Examines procedures for public employee discharge).
  • Stockton v. Department of Employment, 25 Cal. 2d 264 (Concerns good faith in civil service layoffs).

 

About the Author
mesriani-awards-badges-v2

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Related Posts

SCHEDULE YOUR

Free Consultation

Scroll to Top